IJCRCST employs a strict Double-Blind Peer Review process. This means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. This policy guarantees that every manuscript is judged solely on its academic and scientific merit.
How your manuscript is evaluated from submission to decision.
The Editorial Board conducts a preliminary check for plagiarism (must be <15%), scope alignment, and basic formatting guidelines.
The manuscript is anonymized and assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers matching the paper's research area.
Reviewers evaluate the paper based on originality, methodology, and scientific rigor, typically completing their review within 2 to 4 weeks.
The Editor-in-Chief reviews the feedback and makes a final decision: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
Our expert reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following critical parameters:
At IJCRCST, we respect the time-sensitive nature of academic publishing. Our editorial team works diligently to ensure a rapid yet thorough peer review process.